当前位置:首页 > 报告详情

显微镜下的骤停.pdf

上传人: 明**** 编号:617750 2025-03-13 53页 1.24MB

1、Sudden Stops Under the MicroscopeCecilia DassattiRodrigo LluberasCentral Bank of UruguayORT Uruguay UniversityPablo OttonelloDiego PerezMaryland&NBERNYU&NBERNovember 14,202425th Jacques Polak Annual Research ConferenceIntroduction Emerging markets experience recurrent episodes of“sudden stops”Abrupt

2、 reversals of capital flows Macro level:contractions in economic activity,consumption,aggregateinvestment,currency depreciation(e.g.,Calvo et al.06)Goal of this paper:Study the micro-level patterns of adjustmentInform theories explaining macro adjustments Approach:Exploit cross-sectional patterns in

3、 firms borrowing(Khwaja Mian 08,Di Giovanni Kalemli-Ozcan Ulu Baskaya 22)Focus:Uruguay,EM featuring 2 sudden stops and rich loan-level dataSummary1.What are the channels of transmission of sudden stops?Lender channel(e.g.,Calvo 04,Morelli Ottonello Perez 22)Collateral channel(e.g.,Korinek and Mendoz

4、a 14)Risk channel(Neumeyer Perri 05,Uribe Yue 06,Hegarty et al.24)2.Are sudden stops different from regular business cycles?Lender channel more than doubles during episodes of sudden stopsConsistent with intermediaries acceleration mechanisms(e.g.,CaballeroKrishnamurthy 01,Gertler Kiyotaki 10;He Kri

5、shnamurthy 12,Brunnermeier Sannikov 14)We do not find a strengthening of the collateral and risk channels3.Are the effects of sudden stops heterogeneous?Lender channel affects more firms with high risk and in nontradable sectorLess heterogeneity for risk and collateral channelsSummary1.What are the

6、channels of transmission of sudden stops?Lender channel(e.g.,Calvo 04,Morelli Ottonello Perez 22)Collateral channel(e.g.,Korinek and Mendoza 14)Risk channel(Neumeyer Perri 05,Uribe Yue 06,Hegarty et al.24)2.Are sudden stops different from regular business cycles?Lender channel more than doubles duri

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
本文主要研究了新兴市场国家经历的“突然停顿”现象,即资本流动的突然逆转。文章通过分析乌拉圭的微观数据,探讨了这种现象的传导渠道,包括: 1. 贷款渠道:金融中介机构的资产负债表受到负面冲击,减少了对国内借款人的信贷供应。 2. 抵押品渠道:负面冲击导致抵押品价值下降,引发去杠杆化,进一步降低抵押品价值。 3. 风险渠道:全球风险价格上升,提高了对风险资产的借贷成本。 文章发现,在“突然停顿”期间,贷款渠道的作用比平时翻了一番,而抵押品和风险渠道的作用并未加强。此外,贷款渠道对风险较高、非贸易部门的公司影响更大,而抵押品和风险渠道的影响则较为一致。 总体而言,文章强调了金融中介机构的资产负债表和公司违约风险在“突然停顿”期间的重要性,为缓解这种现象的影响提供了政策建议。
突然停电与常规商业周期有何不同? 突然停电对不同类型企业的影响有何差异? 突然停电期间,哪些因素对信贷收缩起主导作用?
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠