当前位置:首页 > 报告详情

气候政策和经济:来自欧洲碳定价倡议的证据.pdf

上传人: 表表 编号:599516 2025-01-24 40页 737.55KB

1、Climate Policy and the Economy:Evidence from Europes Carbon Pricing InitiativesDiego R.K anzigNorthwestern University&NBERMaximilian KonradtGeneva Graduate InstituteIMFER Conference on The Future of Macroeconomic PolicyJune 2023The looming climate crisisClimate change is now at the top of the global

2、 policy agendaCarbon pricing is increasingly used as a tool to mitigate climate changeCarbon taxesCap-and-tradeWe know little about the effects of these policies in practiceEffective at reducing emissions?Short-term economic costs?How do different policies compare?1This paperComprehensive analysis o

3、f carbon pricing policies in EuropeWhy Europe?Global leader in climate policy with 20+years of experienceEU-wide emissions trading scheme(EU ETS)Many countries also enacted carbon taxes at national levelSufficient variation to identify the effects of interestKey challenge:Carbon prices not set in a

4、vacuumWe compare two empirical strategies:high-frequency identification and“control-based”approachProvide unified framework to study impact of cap-and-trade prices&carbon taxes2Main resultsCarbon pricing leads to emission reduction but comes at economic costEconomic effects larger for carbon market

5、than for national carbon taxesRobust to the identification strategy usedIn line with previous evidence in K anzig(2022)and Metcalf and Stock(forthcoming)We look into potential explanations for this findingRevenue recyclingCoverage and pass-throughSpillovers and leakageMonetary policy.3Main resultsUs

6、e of carbon revenues turns out to be crucialCarbon taxes often introduced as part of broader tax reform lowering income taxesEuropean carbon market has no direct measures to cushion effects on households Carbon taxes that do not recycle revenues display stronger economic effectsPass-through and cove

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
本文主要研究了欧洲碳定价政策对经济的影响。主要内容包括: 1. 欧洲碳定价政策包括欧盟排放交易体系(EU ETS)和各国实施的碳税。 2. 研究发现,碳定价政策能有效减少排放,但也会带来经济成本。经济成本在碳市场政策下更大。 3. 碳税通常与更广泛的税收改革一起引入,降低所得税,而欧盟碳市场没有直接措施来缓冲对家庭的影响。 4. 碳税的覆盖范围和传递效应与欧盟排放交易体系不同,能源价格在欧盟排放交易体系价格上涨后显著上涨,而在国家碳税上涨后反应较弱。 5. 欧盟排放交易体系是欧盟范围内的政策,而碳税在国家层面征收,欧盟的紧密整合可能减轻了国家政策的经济影响。 6. 研究还发现,使用碳税收入对家庭进行再分配可以减轻经济影响,但不会抵消减排效果。 7. 结论是,碳定价政策在减少排放方面是成功的,但需要配合其他政策来减轻经济影响和防止泄漏。
欧洲碳税与碳交易对经济影响有何不同? 碳税收入再利用如何影响经济成本? 碳税与碳交易对不同行业影响有何差异?
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠