当前位置:首页 > 报告详情

评估和监测影响:制定风险预防计划框架.pdf

上传人: 表表 编号:1152821 2026-02-14 12页 1.52MB

1、Celeste Young,Roger Jones,Callum Fairnee&Neil Parry.Natural Hazards Research Forum,20 June 2025,Adelaide Evaluating and monitoring for impact:developing a framework for risk prevention programs Natural Hazards Research Australia 2023The teamResearch Research Celeste Young,Victoria UniversityProf Rog

2、er Jones,Victoria UniversityDr Kara Dadswell,Victoria UniversityProf Michelle Ball,Victoria UniversityNeil Parry,Victoria UniversityCallum Fairnee,Community Led SolutionsStepping Stone FilmsProject Management CommitteeProject Management CommitteeMark Owens,Country Fire Authority,VictoriaDr Michael C

3、arroll,Queensland Fire Department Clinton Pilon,Queensland Fire Department Oshanna Alexander,AFAC CEGTMeaghan Leck,Fire and Rescue New South WalesGeorge Goodard,Natural Hazards Research AustraliaParticipating organisations:Participating organisations:Alpine Resorts Victoria,Mt Buller Ski Lifts and H

4、oliday Havens(NSW),AFAC CETG.How we are doing thisOur research is collaborative,research-user focused and context specific.It embeds solutions into organisational systems and practice through:Systemic assessments&analysis Transdisciplinary research teams Ongoing communication,feedback and translatio

5、n Continuous improvement and learning and the provision of support tools.Working with your systems not imposing our system.(Tasks of implementation(Tasks of implementation-based research,Young.C 2016)based research,Young.C 2016)Why do we need to do this?Why do we need to do this?Risks are changingRi

6、sks are changing Lack of national measurement infrastructure Lack of national measurement infrastructure Inconsistent measurements Inconsistent measurements gaps,imbalances and gaps,imbalances and understandings of evaluationunderstandings of evaluation Lack of visibility of effectiveness,value and

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
1. **项目目标**:开发社区层面应急管理风险预防项目的监测评估框架,为全国标准奠定基础。 2. **研究团队**:维多利亚大学主导,联合消防部门(CFA、QFD、FRNSW)及自然危害研究机构等。 3. **核心问题**:风险变化、缺乏全国测量基础设施、评估不一致、项目价值不透明。 4. **方法**:跨学科协作、系统性分析、持续反馈,嵌入组织系统而非强制推行。 5. **进展**:文献综述显示研究碎片化,社区调查(1022人)揭示不同群体对风险预防的认知差异。 6. **参与组织**:阿尔卑斯度假区、假日酒店等,强调社区中心与协作能力。
**风险如何评估?** **社区参与度如何?** **框架有何价值?**
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠