上传人:Kell****reet
编号:126144
2023-05-22
PDF
286页
9.70MB
《2023-2043年科学技术趋势:跨越物理、生物和信息领域报告(卷2)(英文版)(286页).pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《2023-2043年科学技术趋势:跨越物理、生物和信息领域报告(卷2)(英文版)(286页).pdf(286页珍藏版)》请在三个皮匠报告上搜索。
1、Science&TechnologyTrends 2023-2043Across the Physical,Biological,and Information DomainsNATO Science&Technology OrganizationVOLUME 2:AnalysisScience and Technology OrganizationThe research and analysis underlying this report and its conclusions were conducted by the NATO S&TOrganization(STO)drawing
2、upon the support of the Alliances defence S&T community,NATO AlliedCommand Transformation(ACT),and the NATO Communications and Information Agency(NCIA).This report does not represent the official opinion or position of NATO or individual governments butprovides considered advice to NATO and Nations
3、leadership on significant S&T issues.DISCLAIMERDale F.Redinglvaro Martn BlancoAngelo De LuciaCol Laura A.Regan,USAF,PhDDaniel BaylissNATO Science&Technology OrganizationOffice of the Chief ScientistNATO HeadquartersB-1110 BrusselsBelgiumhttp:www.sto.nato.intDistributed free of charge for information
4、al purposes;hard copies may be obtained on request,subject to availability,from the NATO Office of the Chief Scientist.The sale and reproduction of this report for commercial purposes isprohibited.Extracts may be used for bona fide educational and informational purposes,subject to attribution to the
5、NATO S&T Organization.Unless otherwise credited,all non-quantitative graphics were generated through deep learning,text-to-image Gener-ative AI models using Stable Diffusion 2.1 or sourced from and used under Creative Commonslicensing.Copyright NATO Science&Technology Organization,2023First publishe
6、d,March 2023ForewordAstheworldslargestcollabo-rative forum forscience and tech-nology(S&T)re-search in securityand defence,theSTO aims to em-powerNATOstechnological edge.It works to achievethis vision through an active network of around 5,000dedicated scientists,engineers,and analysts who carryout m
7、ore than 300 research activities annually.Research-ing S&T trends,developing new forecasting method-ologies,and identifying novel and disruptive S&T areall critical aspects of this work.As a community ofS&T experts,the STO collaborative network providesunparalleled insights into the latest trends in
8、 defence andsecurity technology,as well as their future evolution andimpact.This second volume of Science&TechnologyTrends 2023-2043 highlights this networks methods,data,and insights on emerging and disruptive technolo-gies,providing a deep dive into the foundations uponwhich Volume 1 of this repor
9、t is built.Mr.John-Mikal StrdalDirector,NATO STO Collaboration Support OfficeForecasting the de-velopment of S&Tpotentiallyrele-vant to NATO overa twenty-year pe-riod is daunting.However,throughrigorous and wide-ranging qualitativeandquantitativemethods,insightsinto the state,rate,and impact of S&Tr
10、elevantforde-fence and security can be constructed.Combininginsights from futures studies,STO technology watch,serious gaming,research meta-analysis,surveying expertopinion,and reviewing national research programmesprovides useful insights into S&T developments.Thisvolume summarises and synthesises
11、these activities,pro-viding a snapshot of future EDT development.It reflectsthe efforts of many individuals and 70 years of historyand intellectual richness of the STO as NATOs originalinnovation engine.Dr.Catherine WarnerDirector,NATO STO Centre for Maritime Research andExperimentationForeword cont
12、.Properly assessingthe state,rate,andimpact on the Al-liance of EDTs andotherpromisingtechnologiesre-quires an evidence-based understand-ing of the over-arching scientificand technologicalecosystem,includ-ing weak technology signals.Various data sources andtechniques were employed to support the ana
13、lysis under-taken in this report.Over four thousand articles,books,meta-studies,documents,and reports were collected,collated,reviewed,and assessed.Supplementing thiscollection,the NATO Office of the Chief Scientist andthe NATO Communications and Information Agency(NCIA)developed the Science&Technol
14、ogy EcosystemAnalysis Model(STEAM).STEAM draws upon a grow-ing collection of millions of English-language journalarticles,pre-prints,and abstracts.STEAM allows deeperinsights into EDTs and creatively exploits ArtificialIntelligence to better understand developments withinthe S&T ecosystem,ultimately
15、 putting the analysis on astronger footing.Nevertheless,STEAM is still a work inprogress,with its analysis more indicative than definitive.With an eye towards the next S&T trends assessment,plans are being made to expand STEAM to includepatent data,non-English language articles,and deeperAI-enabled
16、analysis of S&T trends.In addition,theplanned role of STEAM will be enlarged into a broaderbusiness intelligence tool.This will enable a deeperunderstanding of international research and capabilitydevelopment collaboration patterns while supportingNATOs S&T portfolio management.In turn,this willallo
17、w NATO to anticipate,deliver and react to EDTdevelopments and enabled capabilities.Mr.Dale F.RedingSenior Scientific AdvisorNATO STO Office of the Chief ScientistTable of ContentsForeword.iiiExecutive Summary-Volume 2.vii1Introduction.11.1Context11.2Analysis21.3Approach21.4Overview32Methodology.42.1
18、Description42.2Assessment42.3Information Sources102.4Alliance and Partner Research Programmes182.5MetaStudies,Articles and Reports213EDT Analysis.223.1Description223.2Exploration of Selected EDTs234Conclusion.24Appendices.25AArtificial Intelligence.26BRobotics and Autonomous Systems.44viCBiotechnolo
19、gy&Human Enhancement.57DData.75EElectronics and Electromagnetics.100FEnergy&Propulsion.113GHypersonics.125HNovel Materials and Manufacturing.135IQuantum Technologies.149JSpace Technologies.164KSTO Technical Network Survey.179LS&T Ecosystem Analysis Model(STEAM).201Bibliography.209Symbols,Abbreviatio
20、ns and Acronyms.272Executive Summary-Volume 2Science&Technology Trends:2023-2043 provides an updated assessment of Science&Technology(S&T)trends and their potential impact on NATO military operations,defence capabilities,enterprisefunctions,and political decision space.Such an assessment draws upon
21、the collective insights andresearch activities of the NATO Science&Technology Organization(STO),its collaborative network ofover five thousand active scientists,analysts,researchers,engineers,and associated research facilities.These insights have been combined with an extensive review of the open-so
22、urce S&T literature,selectednational research programs,NATO STO technology watch activities,(serious)research games,STOCPoW(Collaborative Programme of Work)activities,and NATO innovation endeavours.Given the volume of work undertaken,the report has been split into two volumes.The first sum-marises t
23、he analysis and discusses,in general terms,key geopolitical and social trends impacted by S&Tdevelopments or the impact of those developments themselves.The second provides a detailed discussionof the methodology,data,and analysis that underpins the recommendations and observations in Volume 1.This
24、second volume also provides a deep dive into the individual emerging and disruptive technologies,their potential impact on military capabilities,and their impact on other EDTs.Extensive use is madeof quantitative analyses of recent academic articles,scientometric assessments,and a survey of the STOn
25、etwork to assess the state,rate,and potential impact of these technologies.Extensive references are alsoprovided to support the conclusions and facilitate an even deeper analysis by the reader.1.Introduction“We are still the masters of our fate.Rational thinking,even assisted by any conceivable elec
26、troniccomputors,cannot predict the future.All it can do is to map out the probability space as it appears atthe present and which will be different tomorrow when one of the infinity of possible states will havematerialised.Technological and social inventions are broadening this probability space all
27、 the time;it isnow incomparably larger than it was before the industrial revolutionfor good or for evil.”DennisGabor 1The Future-Mapping Out the Probability Space1.1ContextSince the last Science and Technology(S&T)trends assessment 2,the world has seen technological,social and geopolitical change an
28、d disruption at an unprecedented level.Over the last three years,NATO,and the world as a whole,have been challenged by the pandemic of the century(COVID-19),theRussian-Ukrainian war,the withdrawal of NATO forces from Afghanistan,significant climate disruption,the rise of potential nuclear powers,inf
29、lation,increased tensions in the Asia-Pacific,the challenge oftechno-authoritarianism,as well as insatiable S&T progress,especially in the areas of Data,Quantum,Biotechnology,Autonomy and AI.NATO is a unique consultative and collaborative military and political framework.This collaborationextends be
30、yond the military,and political realms to science and technology,enabling the application ofstate-of-the-art validated knowledge for defence and security purposes.NATO S&T activities embracescientific research,technology development,analytical assessments,capability planning,experimentation,and a wi
31、de range of related scientific activities 3.The Science and Technology Organization(STO)plays a decisive role in supporting innovation;providing profound insights into alliance challenges;ensuring the integration of Alliance capabilities;and making available an interconnected network of science and
32、knowledge workers capable of providingevidence-based advice to NATO,as well as alliance members and partners.At its core,the role of NATOsS&T community is to 3:“.maintain NATOs scientific and technological advantage by generating,sharing and util-ising advanced scientific knowledge,technological dev
33、elopments and innovation to supportthe alliances core tasks.”To support the strategic development of such technologies,the STO is responsible for assessing S&Tfutures for senior leadership.As noted in the STO charter(2012)3:1.2 Analysis2“To fulfil its mission,the STO will.provide advice to NATO and
34、Nations leadershipon significant S&T issues,including the identification of emerging technologies,and theassessment of their impact on defence and security.”1.2AnalysisScience&Technology Trends(2023-2043)provides context and a foundation for a NATO technologystrategy,Alliance capability development
35、and the NATO S&T programmes of work.The core objective isto increase the understanding within the Alliance of the potential for S&T developments to enhance orthreaten Alliance military operations.Increased awareness of the state,the projected rate of development,and the anticipated impact of such te
36、chnologies should lead to enhanced future capabilities,better strategicdecision-making and improved S&T portfolio management.Such an assessment does not attempt topredict the future in detail(a difficult task at best and impossible at worst).Instead,it seeks to provide acontext for anticipating the
37、possible development of S&T and its potential impact on the Alliance.Analyses of technology trends and the associated process of technology watch are critical steps toidentify new militarily important technologies and communicate the potential impact of these technologieson NATO and national leaders
38、hip.Those recognised technologies hold the promise to enable thedevelopment of disruptive military capabilities for Alliance(BLUE)and potential adversarial(RED)forces.The report assesses S&T trends(emerging and disruptive technologies)projected to impact NATOoperations,capability development and cor
39、e functions over the next 20 years and explores the implicationsof these changes.These S&T areas are broad,have significant overlaps,are not orthogonal and areexpected to:Mature over 20 years;Be transformative or revolutionary;and,Be emergent or create generational shifts in S&T development.1.3Appro
40、achThis report aims to reach a wide audience both inside and outside of NATO and its partners.We do soto stimulate a frank and open discussion of potential opportunities and risks presented by technologicaldevelopments over the next 20 years.As such,the report is based strictly on the following:Tech
41、nology trends discussed in the open literature;A global perspective on technological progress;Scientometric analysis;and,Logical reasoning informed by Alliance S&T expertise and technology watch activities.Defence Ministers approved a canonical set of EDTs and an associated roadmap in October 2019.I
42、n2022,the 2022 Alliance Heads of State and Government Madrid summit authorised two more prioritytechnologies for consideration,Novel Materials and Agile Manufacturing and Energy and Propulsion.Inkeeping with the STOs mandate to continue to monitor and evaluate the broader technological landscape,thi
43、s report also considers the status of recent developments in Electronics&Electromagnetic(E&EM)technologies,including developments in directed energy weapons.As such,10 EDTs are considered indetail in this report,each broken down into technology focus areas,highlighting specific areas of researchand
44、development(R&D).Chapter 2 discusses this decomposition in further detail.Science&Technology Trends:2023-2043 supersedes the Science&Technology Trends:2020-2040report 2 but draws heavily upon its foundations,structure,insights and lessons learned.Indeed,thisreport is best considered an update to the
45、 previous report.As before,the report exploits a broad range3Chapter 1.Introductionof open-source reports,internal assessments,NATO EDT and innovation activities,technology reviews,serious games,quantitative analysis and futures studies to develop a comprehensive understanding of thefuture technolog
46、y landscape.These sources include:Existing NATO S&T trend and future security environment studies,strategies,discussions andassessments;Technology watch activities conducted by the STO,including existing Technology Watch Cards(TWC)(current as of October 2022),Chief Scientist Reports,(serious)technol
47、ogy games and VonKrmn Horizon Scans(vKHS);Meta-analyses and reviews of open source technology watch and futures research from defence,security and industry sources;Internal and external quantitative analysis of academic publications,patents and research activities;Scientometric analysis of the globa
48、l S&T ecosystem;Surveys of the STO network and panels seeking insights into technological developments,readinessand maturity;NATO-sponsored EDT workshops and innovation system engagements;and,Alliance and partner EDT studies and research programs.1.4OverviewWithin the following appendices,an analysi
49、s is presented of identified and militarily relevant S&T trends,which may impact NATO capability development and operational challenges over the upcoming 20 years(2023-2043).The approach and key data sources used to conduct this assessment are described in Chapter2.Separate appendices provide a more
50、 detailed exploration of each EDT,drawing heavily upon STOresearch and technology watch activities.This section also includes Conjecture Cards,short vignettes thatdescribe the potential future application of these technologies.They are included to help contextualisethe potential impact of these tech
51、nologies but do not necessarily represent research interests or activitiesbeing undertaken by NATO or members of the Alliance.The bibliography at the end of this document provides an extensive list of useful references.Theseare also used throughout the body of the text where appropriate.When using t
52、he Adobe PDF version ofthe report,clicking on a numbered reference will take the reader to the relevant entry in the bibliography.If desired and available,clicking on the provided URL(i.e.,web-link)will allow the reader to open thesource reference directly for further study and exploration of the to
53、pic.2.Methodology“Finding patterns is easy in any kind of data-rich environment;thats what mediocre gamblers do.Thekey is in determining whether the patterns represent noise or signal.”-Nate Silver 4Forecasting:2.1DescriptionForecasting S&T development is a challenging task that demands a structured
54、,thoughtful and information-intensive process.We have taken such an approach in developing this report,drawing from multiplesources and assessments while seeking common patterns or indicators from within the informationavailable.For transparency and challenge,the approach and key data sources used t
55、o conduct thisassessment are described in the following sections.2.2AssessmentTo understand the state,rate and impact of EDT development,it is necessary to consider the following:technological maturity(current and future);keywords defining sub-areas and other technological connections;level of atten
56、tion or hype around a particular technology or scientific area;integration into NATO operational and enterprise capabilities;and,potential military impact.Such an assessment is problematic as each EDT encompasses many different core aspects,eachpotentially at a different stage of development.As a re
57、sult,for this report,each EDT is broken into asecond level of areas identified for focused development or research.We refer to these as EDT technologyfocus areas.These areas are very broad,and assessments of the state and rate of development willnecessarily be somewhat fuzzy in nature.The report emp
58、loys several approaches described in more detailbelow.5Chapter 2.Methodology2.2.1Technological MaturityIn general successful S&T proceeds along a developmental path captured as technology readiness levels(TRLs),originally developed by NASA 5,6.Each level is a potential off-ramp or pause for that par
59、ticulartechnology(see Table 2.1).These levels provide a useful shorthand for interpreting technology maturityand,as such,are widely used within industry and government.Similar frameworks 7,8,9 are availablefor human,algorithm,manufacturing,commercialisation,machine learning,and technology commitment
60、readiness levels.Table 2.1:Technology Readiness Levels.TRL 9Actual system proven through successful mission operations.TRL 8Actual system completed and qualified through test and demonstration.TRL 7System prototype demonstration in a space environment.TRL 6System/subsystem model or prototype demonst
61、ration in a relevant environment.TRL 5Component and/or breadboard validation in a relevant environment.TRL 4Component and/or breadboard validation in a laboratory environment.TRL 3Analytical and experimental critical function and/or characteristic proof-of-concept.TRL 2Technology concept and/or appl
62、ication formulated.TRL 1Basic principles observed and reported.Technologies,or the underlying sciences,may be unsuccessful in generating new operational capabili-ties or pause at any point along the path to TRL 9+due to several factors,including lagging dependencieson other technologies,costs,ethics
63、,policies or fundamental physical,information or human limits.Eval-uating when these technologies will reach TRL 9 assesses full technological maturity and utility foroperational and enterprise capabilities.Unsuccessful developments are necessary within S&T to inform and ultimately give rise to newa
64、pproaches and technologies that may be more successful in moving from basic principles to operationalcapabilities.As the American inventor Thomas Edison stated:“I have gotten a lot of results!I knowseveral thousand things that wont work.”10.Thus,constructive failure is a feature of scientific andtec
65、hnological developments,not a bug.We assess the current TRL levels primarily through STO Technology watch activities assessments,asurvey of the STO experts network,related futures assessments,and references to several available TRLcalculators 11.It should be noted that emerging technologies are usua
66、lly in the range of TRL 1 through5 12.2.2.2KeywordsKeywords associated with an EDT provide insights into research areas,sub-areas and synergies.Keywordsfor this report are drawn from several quantitative and qualitative sources.They include analysis ofpublication databases,publication guidelines(e.g
67、.IEEE 13),critical technology lists 14,15,16 andSTO survey results.2.2.3AttentionTechnological development is distinctly cyclic on many levels.The most well-known of these cycles isthe Gartner Hype Cycle 17(Figure 2.1),itself based on Howard Fosdicks work on the sociology oftechnology adoption 18,19
68、.While this relates to TRLs,such an assessment reflects a socio-technicalperspective on the state of development of technology and the likelihood of continued advancements inthis area.Essentially this captures buzz,or more accurately attention around a technology.Technologies do not always progress
69、from the beginning to the end of such a cycle;indeed,as notedearlier,most technologies fail.Moreover,many avenues of science or technological discovery never breakthrough to ignite innovation.Instead,they disappear from public consciousness after initial enthusiasmas unproductive avenues of developm
70、ent,or they may appear later on as new convergent developmentsreinvigorating an old idea.Finally,even successful technologies may reappear as novel ideas create2.2 Assessment6innovation triggers and old technologies become so integrated into production systems that the originalconnection is lost on
71、all but the most technically minded.Such an evolutionary process built on heroicfailures 20 or creative errors is essential to scientific and technological progress,as lessons and ideasthat arise will often lead to entirely new areas for exploration,innovation and development.During a hype cycle,a s
72、uccessful trending technology will(arguably)ultimately go through five keyphases:21,22:Innovation Trigger:After considerable supporting research,a potential new technology break-through shows promise.This initial innovation trigger builds upon early experimentation and resultsin proof-of-concept sto
73、ries,and media interest is triggered.This spark yields growing publicity andinternet search activity.However,no viable product exists at this stage,and commercial viabilityremains unproven.Peak of Inflated Expectations:Early publicity produces many success stories often accompa-nied by scores of fai
74、lures.Interest(e.g.as measured by web searches)is at an all-time peak.Someinnovative companies take action;many do not.Trough of Disillusionment:The limitations of the technology become clear,and some implemen-tation efforts fail to produce useful results.As a result,general interest falls,and negat
75、ive storiesbecome more frequent,although these may be overly pessimistic.Eventually,some developersand producers move on to other areas or fail outright.A bifurcation occurs at this point,whereinvestment and continued developments only occur if continued progress can be shown throughthe refinement o
76、f the underlying technology,the development of a better understanding of wherethis technology is most applicable or a convergence of other technologies or demand.If this doesnot happen,the technology will eventually be deemed unproductive and disappear entirely fromconsideration,or return to the sta
77、rt gate to await further developments,technological convergenceor changing circumstances.Slope of Enlightenment:With a better understanding of what is practical and where it can be bestapplied,the potential begins to crystallise and become more widely understood and appreciated.Next-generation produ
78、cts occur,and positive attention increases with more successful trials andpilot products.Some companies remain cautious.Plateau of Productivity:Mainstream adoption occurs.With a better understanding of value,applicability and limitations,the technology has found its market.Issues and new ideas may s
79、tillarise,potentially kicking off a new cycle.Otherwise,the technology becomes so well integrated intothe technological landscape that its use becomes commonplace until a new technological advancesupplants it.Balancing out the highs of inflated expectations and the lows of the trough of disillusionm
80、ent is criticalin making investment and long-term capability decisions.The exact placement of technology on such acurve is problematic,as is the focus on hype rather than a measurable quantity,such as attention.Thisreport will distinguish between emerging technologies(those in the early steps of the
81、 curve)and disruptivetechnologies(typically towards the middle to end of the Gartner curve).In contrast to the last S&T report 2 this report does not track hype trends,although the Gartnerannual report 23 was consulted,along with many other sources.This decision was based on a beliefthat the hype as
82、sessment added little to the discussion for NATO above and beyond the TRL assessment.Figure 2.1 presents the Gartner consolidated assessment for all emerging technologies considered tobe of interest to a general business audience as assessed in 2022.While this is very useful as a sourceof data and a
83、nalysis for understanding EDTs,it does not focus on defence applications and considersdevelopments over a 2 to 10-year horizon.One of the more interesting observations in the 2022 emerging technologies list is the identificationof three major themes:evolving/expanding immersive experiences,accelerat
84、ed AI automation,and7Chapter 2.MethodologyFigure 2.1:Gartner Hype Cycle 2022(CREDIT:Gartner 24).2.2 Assessment8optimised technologist delivery.When explored in detail,these themes align well with this reportsidentified technology themes(intelligent,interconnected,decentralised,and digital),which wer
85、e carriedover from 2.Figure 2.2 presents the Gartner assessment for sub-areas associated with AI,considered to be ofinterest to a general business audience as assessed in 2022.Figure 2.2:Gartner Hype Cycle-Artificial Intelligence 2021(CREDIT:Gartner 25).2.2.4CapabilityFor NATO,EDTs are primarily of
86、interest through their influence on current and future Alliance defencecapabilities.To better connect EDTs to their military impact,each EDT is evaluated for its potential effecton NATO operational capabilities.NATOs operational capability taxonomy 26 provides a structured listof capabilities and su
87、b-capabilities.In addition,the first level capability Enable is added to this list tocapture NATO enterprise functions unrelated to a specific military operation.The first level capabilitiesused are:ENABLE:This capability supports the strategic or organisational functions necessary to supportAllianc
88、e political and military operations in all domains,levels,and across all MCAs.For ourpurposes,Enable includes additional basic business processes such as Govern,Generate,andOperate,identified in 26.These are the capabilities required to run and manage any large defenceand security establishment.Such
89、 generic processes focus on support services required throughout9Chapter 2.Methodologythe defence enterprise,such as financial,human resources,policy development,defence planning,legal,etc.,interfacing with almost every other process in the enterprise,whether governance,strategy,force development,or
90、 operations.PREPARE:To establish,prepare and sustain sufficient and effective presence at the right time,including building up forces through appropriate and graduated readiness,to meet any requirements,keeping enough flexibility to adapt to possible changes in the strategic environment.These alsoin
91、clude the capabilities to contribute to Deterrence and Defence,Resilience and Projecting Stability.PROJECT:To conduct strategic deployment of headquarters(both for the NATO Force Structureand at a national level),forces and capabilities supporting any Alliance mission.These also includethe capabilit
92、y to contribute to deterrence.SUSTAIN:To plan and execute the timely support and sustainment of forces,including essentialmilitary infrastructure,movement and transportation,military engineering support,contracting,supply,maintenance,services management,basing support and health and medical support.
93、ENGAGE:To perform the tasks that contribute directly to achieving mission goals within collectivedefence,crisis management,and cooperative security operations.It includes all capabilities requiredto defeat,if necessary,adversaries as well as other capabilities such as,among other things,thoseneeded
94、to evacuate non-combatants,prevent the use of force by opponents,train local securityforces and participate in stabilisation and reconstruction.PROTECT:To conduct strategic deployment of headquarters(both for the NATO Force Structureand at a national level),forces and capabilities supporting any All
95、iance mission.These also includethe capability to contribute to deterrence.INFORM:To establish and maintain the situational awareness and knowledge required to allowcommanders at all levels to make timely and informed decisions.CONSULT,COMMAND,AND CONTROL(C3):For commanders to exercise authority ove
96、rand direct the full spectrum of assigned and attached forces in accomplishing the mission.Includethe capability:to communicate and coordinate with other actors which are present or involved inthe operational area and effective information exchange with the political and military leadership;the capa
97、bility to plan,employ and coordinate civilian activities with other actors and organisations;capability for nuclear planning and political consultation that allow the rapid development of nuclearemployment options in crisis and war,should circumstances so dictate.An assessment is presented for Enabl
98、e and the first level of the operational taxonomy only:Prepare,Project,Engage,C3,Sustain,Protect,and Inform.This assessment is presented later in Appendices A-J.2.2.5ImpactAssessing the potential impact of emerging or disruptive technologies is a complex process.To doso successfully requires conside
99、ration of the threat environment(current and future),legal&policyconstraints,political factors,and investment decisions,as well as estimating the potential for organisationaluptake(e.g.entrepreneurial drive and risk tolerance)27.These estimates are further compounded if theroad to disruption involve
100、s complex combinations of such technologies(e.g.synergies)or requires thedevelopment of new concepts.For purposes of this report we follow 27,defining Impact in a somewhat subjective and imprecisemanner as(Table 2.2):2.3 Information Sources10Table 2.2:EDT Impact.ScalePerformance:speed,range,accuracy
101、,lethality,survivability,affordability,availability,de-pendability or other defining capability characteristicModerate10-50 improvement%High50-100 improvement%RevolutionaryGreater than 100%,or conducting activities or tasks hitherto deemed impractical or impossibleAssessments in this report of the m
102、ilitary impact of relevant technologies are based predominately onthe results captured in 2 and a wisdom-of-the-crowd”assessment,supported by a survey of the NATOSTO network.An in-depth discussion of the survey results may be found in Appendix K.2.3Information Sources2.3.1NATO Reports and StudiesThe
103、 following NATO-released documents were used in the preparation of this report:Framework for Future Alliance Operations(2018)In future operations,NATO must continually evolve,adapt,and innovate to maintain a decision andcapability advantage(credible,networked,aware,agile and resilient).The Framework
104、 for Future AllianceOperations 2018(FFAO)28 provides a futures perspective supporting such developments.It informs theAlliance of opportunities to improve its defence and deterrence posture and its ability to project stability,ensuring it remains continuously proactive,ready and responsive.It descri
105、bes how NATO forces can keepthe edge and retain the ability to defeat potential adversaries on future battlefields.Finally,it providesmilitary advice identifying force characteristics and abilities the Alliance needs to retain the military edge,address upcoming challenges,and seize future opportunit
106、ies.The FFAO identifies several instability situations,potential events of critical significance,which couldreach the threshold requiring the Alliance to use military forces.These instability situations provide auseful framework for assessing the impact of EDTs,both from a threat and opportunities p
107、erspective,andare listed below:Weapons of Mass DestructionConventional WarThreat EscalationHybrid WarIrregular WarTerrorismGlobal Commons DisruptionCritical Infrastructure AttackInformation WarfareCyberattackGovernance ChallengesEndangerment of Civilian PopulationsMass MigrationPandemic DiseaseNatur
108、al or Man-made DisasterThe report identifies anticipated future operational challenges.These include the impact of technologi-cal advances;new concepts of operation(e.g.global strike,hybrid,and cyberspace operations);and shiftsin the geopolitical landscape.Of interest to the assessment of EDTs,the r
109、eport notes that future-armedconflict is expected to be characterised by any combination of:Adversaries(state and non-state)global inscope and employing indirect approaches;A greater role of super-empowered individu-als and non-state actors that produce hard-to-predict effects;A compression of strat
110、egic,operational andtactical decision-making,blurring decision-making processes;More inter-connectivity across air,land,sea,cyber,space and information domains;Small units fighting over greater distances;Operations in the cyberspace domain,globalcommons,urban areas,and subterranean ar-eas;Rapidly em
111、erging and widely available tech-nologies;11Chapter 2.MethodologyThe use of human enhancement and the risingimportance of the human-machine interface;The use of automated and potentially au-tonomous systems and operations in whichhumans are not directly involved in the deci-sion cycle;New classes of
112、 weapons that can causewidespread destruction;Greater number of sensors and the prolifera-tion of the internet of things;An expanded access to knowledge,includingthe ability to conduct large-scale advanceddata analytics to gain a military advantage;and,Weaponised information activities intendedto in
113、fluence populations alone or in supportof armed conflict.Emerging or Disruptive Technologies Roadmap(2019)NATO Defence Ministers approved an EDT Roadmap in October 2019.This provided a canonical list ofseven EDTs providing structure to subsequent innovation,strategies and associated roadmap developm
114、entswithin NATO over the last three years(e.g.29,30.Following this,in February 2021,NATO DefenceMinisters approved an EDT strategy to guide NATOs development of EDT policy 31.Science&Technology Trends:2020-2040(2020)This report 2,published in March of 2020,highlighted S&T trends assessed by the NATO
115、 STO.It was thesecond comprehensive report on emerging trends in S&T by the NATO STO,with the first being publishedin 2017 32.The report exploited a broad range of open-source reports,internal assessments,and studiesof potential futures to develop a comprehensive understanding of the future technolo
116、gy landscape.Thesesources included:1)Existing NATO S&T trend and future security environment studies,discussionsand assessments;2)Technology watch activities conducted by the S&T Organisation,including existingTechnology Watch Cards(TWC)(current as of Feb 2019)and von Krmn Horizon Scans(vKHS);3)Meta
117、-analyses and reviews of open-source technology watch and futures research articles/reports fromdefence,security,and industry sources;4)NATO-sponsored EDT workshops and innovation systemengagements;and,5)Alliance and partner EDT studies and research programs.The EDT taxonomy used in the 2020 S&T Tre
118、nds report 2 builds on the canonical set of seven EDTs,adding Materials(Novel Materials and Agile Manufacturing)based on STO foresight activities.DefenceMinisters approved the first seven EDTs in October 2019,while the STO added an eighth(Materials)area for future consideration and development.Inclu
119、ding an eighth EDT recognises that materials andmanufacturing research are well-developed technologically yet increasingly disruptive(e.g.3D/4Dmanufacturing).At the same time,some aspects are emergent(e.g.novel materials,bio-manufacturing,and nanotechnologies).These eight highly interrelated S&T are
120、as are still forecasted to be major strategic disruptors over thenext 20 years.These S&T areas are either currently in nascent development stages or undergoing rapidrevolutionary development.The EDTs identified were:DataArtificial Intelligence(AI)AutonomySpaceHypersonicsQuantumBiotechnologyMaterials
121、2.3.2NATO STO Technology Watch ActivitiesCollaborative Research Program(CPoW)NATO S&T Priority AreasA set of NATO research priorities guides S&T conducted under the auspices of the STO,as agreed to bythe Nations through the S&T Board(STB).These priorities influence medium to long-term S&T planningac
122、ross NATO and inform S&T investment decisions within the Nations.In addition,the STO maintainsan understanding of current and future S&T,including broad themes and EDTs,through engagement withthe approximately 5000 active scientists,engineers and analysts participating in the collaborative researchp
123、rogram(CPoW).The STO S&T priorities are organised into ten S&T Areas,spanning the Human,information andphysical sciences.Each area has a specific defined Targets of Emphasis(TOE).While there are many2.3 Information Sources12ways of organising S&T activities,the ten S&T Areas provide a broad and usef
124、ul reference frame forresearch activities,while the TOEs provide selective focus and orientation.The priorities are constructedindependent of physical domains,scientific disciplines,or specific applications,while the language issituated between the words used to express requirements and S&T solution
125、s.The employment of theprioritiesfocuses onS&Tefforts thatsupportinnovativecapabilitiesfor theAlliancesforces,informfuturemilitary specifications,and provide strategic advice to senior decision-makers.Table 2.3 summarisesthese priorities and associated targets of emphasis.Table 2.3:NATO S&T Prioriti
126、es.DomainNATO S&T Priority AreasTargets of EmphasisHUMANAdvanced Human Performance&HealthMedical Solutions for Health OptimisationHuman ResiliencyEnhanced Cognitive PerformanceHuman&Machine InterfacesCultural,Social&Organisational BehavioursSocial InfluencePolitical InfluenceCultural CommunicationsG
127、roup&Organisational BehaviourINFORMATIONData Collection and ProcessingEM SensorsNon-EM SensorsSensor Integration&NetworksAdvanced Signal ProcessingInformation Analysis&Decision SupportBig Data&Long Data Processing and AnalysisBig Data&Human Decision MakingMulti-Domain Situational AwarenessPlanning a
128、nd Managing UncertaintiesAdvanced Systems ConceptsIntegrated Human-Machine Hybrid ForceClusters&SwarmsModular,Scalable SystemsHigh Assurance Engineering&ValidationAutonomyArtificial IntelligenceMission Autonomous SystemsHuman-Autonomous Machine TeamingCommunications&NetworksSecure and Resilient Comm
129、unicationsTrusted Multi-Domain Information SharingAd hoc and Heterogeneous NetworksPHYSICALPrecision EngagementPrecision ControlWeapons-Techniques and SystemsWeapons-EffectsActive&Passive EM,Acoustic&Optical CountermeasuresPlatforms&MaterialsFast and Agile PlatformsUnmanned PlatformsHypersonic Platf
130、ormsAdvanced and Adaptive MaterialsIn-Theatre Fabrication&Production of EquipmentPower&EnergyPower&Energy StorageAlternative&Renewable Energy SourcesPropulsionEnhanced Energy Efficiency&ManagementTargets of emphasis do not naturally align with the more broadly identified EDTs nor provide sufficientr
131、esolution of potential or current development areas found within the identified EDTs.Nevertheless,theyare useful for providing insights into developing a second layer to the EDT decomposition.For purposesof this report,we refer to these as Technical Focus Areas(TFA).TFAs are sub-aspects of EDTs suit
132、ablefor focused research.Technology Watch Cards(TWC)Recognising the pressing need to maintain the Alliances technological edge,the STO actively pursuesTechnology Watch for the Alliance.The STO Panels and Group have embraced a culture of continuallyidentifying and documenting potentially disruptive s
133、cience or technology in Technology Watch Cards.These cards contain assessments of the maturity of the science or technology and offer commentary onhow science or technology may affect the capabilities of the Alliance and potential adversaries in the13Chapter 2.Methodologyfuture.The current S&T Trend
134、s report relies heavily on the almost one hundred Technology Watch Cardsdeveloped by the STO Panels and Group to deliver a short synthesis of observed technology trends.TWCassessments and text were especially helpful in drafting the more detailed appendices in this report.TWCcards that have been rec
135、ently developed,updated or are in the process of being updated are:AVT:Hypersonic Vehicles Additive ManufacturingHFM:Digital twin of the human Emotional design;Designing interface that takes into account emotionalresponses Trust engineeringIST:Probabilistic Programming Languages Electromagnetic Meta
136、surfaces Free Space Optical Commu-nications-Communications and Networks Self-Organising Networks-Communications and Networks Compressive Sensing for EO-IR systems Neuroelectronics Intelligent Autonomy Blockchain Tech-nology Digital Twins Multi-Party Computation Real Avatars Quantum-safe cryptography
137、 QuantumTechnologies-Communications and Networks,Computing&Simulation,Sensing&Imaging Blockchainand Distributed Ledger Technologies SAS:(N/A)SCI:Alternative Computing Architectures Integrated Defensive Aid Systems AI&counter-AI SensingSystems System V&VSET:Cognitive EW Early warning passive RF syste
138、ms Fully digital RF Systems Quantum Sensing Neuromorphic Processing Crystal Vacancy Centre Sensors Metal-Organic Frameworks Space-borneHyper-spectral Capability Adaptive Optics Multi-band Thermal Imagery SWIR imagery Remote DigitalHolography Ultrashort Laser Application for Defence and Security Inte
139、grated RF Photonics DeepLearning for Military EO/IR ATRMSG:Modelling and Simulation for social media Artificial Intelligence-Data-driven Behaviour Modelling Immersive Simulation Devices for Improving Dismantled Soldier Reparation with Augmented and MixedReality DevicesAs most tech watch cards are NA
140、TO UNCLASSIFIED,they are used predominately to flag areasof interest and provide contextual information.All conclusions in this report are based on open-sourcematerials.Von Krmn Horizon Scans(vKHS)To address emerging challenges,the von Krmn Horizon Scans(vKHS)is an instrument to quicklyperform a tec
141、hnology scan on a particular S&T topic within an abbreviated period(typically two to 6months).The process assesses the state of leading-edge research in a specific S&T area,the outlook forthe next decade,its relevance for the armed forces,and potential avenues for investment.They draw uponinternatio
142、nally recognised S&T expertise and experienced senior military.von Krmn Horizon Scanshave been undertaken on laser weapons,quantum technologies,artificial intelligence,and optronic 3Dimaging systems.WorkshopsFrom 8 to 9 February 2021,the NATO Science&Technology Organization(STO)conducted theDisrupti
143、ve Technologies Table-Top Exercise(D3TX),its first fully virtual serious(public release)game toassess the military relevance and potential impact of emerging and disruptive technologies(EDTs)33.This ambitious event attracted over two hundred active participants from various backgrounds,includingthe
144、armed forces,policy-making,procurement,defence research,academia,and industry,from Allied andmany Partner Nations.Participants of different professional backgrounds were grouped into small syndicates of eight tofourteen players.Each syndicate played within one scenario but addressed all capabilities
145、 and assessed alltechnologies.Further,the D3TX provided a means for exploring the operational impact of previouslyidentified EDTs and TFA.However,it also identified innovative technology areas(so-called weak signals).These areas have been considered in the development of this report.The D3TX tackled
146、 the challenging assessment of the technological impact on military operationsfrom several different angles:2.3 Information Sources14Figure 2.3:Disruptive Technologies Table-Top Exercise(D3TX)33.The D3TX was played against four bespoke scenarios that covered the full spectrum of Alliancecore tasks a
147、s identified in NATOs Strategic Concept:Collective Defence,Crisis Management,andCooperative Security.The D3TX addressed the comprehensive set of required military and enterprise capabilities acrossthe air,sea,land,cyber,and space domain.The capabilities were:Enable,Prepare,Project,Sustain,Engage,Pro
148、tect,C3 and Inform.The D3TX assessed a broad range of emerging and disruptive technologies,represented by twenty-seven Technology Cards(based on 2),while also allowing players to identify“weak(technology)signal”cards.2.3.3SurveysFeedback on Emerging S&TDuring the spring STO panel meetings,the STO pa
149、nels were asked to provide a rough assessment ofwhich technology areas were considered emergent and disruptive.This allowed additional detail to beadded to the development of the TFAs,augmenting the information derived from the TWCs.The listgenerated per panel:AVT:Electric drive Renewable energy Sin
150、gle staged orbit(launch)Energy management HFM:Ethical,Legal and Social Implications(AI and BHET)IST:AI Big data analytics and visualisation Robotic process automation Quantum computing andalgorithms Virtual/Augmented/Extended(VR/AR/XR)reality,tele-existence and real avatars Data-centricarchitecture/
151、security Distributed resilient infrastructure:Tactical cloud/edge computing/HeterogeneousMANET/SDN/NFE for tactical networks/cognitive radio/cognitive networks Military Internet ofMilitary Things Counter/adversarial-AI and AI for cyber Homomorphic encryption,quantum-safe crypto Trust architectures/d
152、igital trust Ethical,legal,societal and environmental aspects of technology bydesign/human-machine teaming ICT(Information and Communication Technology)Supply chain security(devices and materials)15Chapter 2.MethodologySAS:Non-military/non-government leadership in tech Blockchain Swarm tech(cooperat
153、ive autonomy)Critical materials shortages/synthetic substitute.State of fear Data science Complexity and uncertainty Invisibility(materials)Neuroscience,mind control Hypersonic/autonomy combinedSCI:Alternative Computational Architectures Quantum technologies Ethical,legal,and social implica-tions(as
154、pects)with the widespread use of AI(ELSI/ELSA)Massive or Ultra-large Systems of systems(SoS)Self-configurable integration and interoperability Self-Adaptive AI and Massive use of Reinforce-ment Learning General Purpose Artificial Intelligence Hyperconvergent Infrastructure Autonomy forlow-cost,attri
155、table weapons Offensive cyber Multi-use autonomous defences and how does it change theair power game Climate change How do our systems work in a changing environment Applications ofquantum technology Interruption of the hypersonic kill chain Space denial/protection Interoperability(Standards)managin
156、g operations in the EW spectrum Use and democratisation of direct energy weapons(DEW)AI Automation Hyperspace AI/Automation within cyber Human trust in autonomySET:Cognition and AI for RF-Sensor Technology RF Technology for counter-UAS applications RFand digital technology Space Situational Awarenes
157、s Quantum Algorithms for Data Fusion IntegratedPhotonic Sensing Neuromorphic Processing Crystal Vacancy Centre Sensors AI for underwater autonomyexploration/sensing Certification of AI systems Metal-Organic Frameworks Neuromorphic sensing Mid-IR lasers Quantum lidar Photonic integrated circuits Meta
158、lenses Single photon counting detectorarrays in the infrared MSG:Digital TwinEDT Survey of STO PanelsThe STO network consists of approximately five thousand active science workers.A survey was preparedand distributed to all STO panels and members engaged in the research network to leverage this expe
159、rtise.The survey was available in 2022 from early September to the beginning of November.It collectedinformation on technology readiness levels,maturity forecasts and critical keywords associated with theEDTs and TFA.The survey results have provided a wisdom of the crowd assessment,with individualsc
160、ontributing appraisals only to those EDTs for which they have experience or interest.Out of approximately 5000 active participants within the STO network,approximately 8%respondedto the survey.Such a response rate is considered average for an external survey of this type.Figure 2.5demonstrates the a
161、ssessments by EDT.2.3.4ReportsOver the last two years,the STO has responded to NATO leaders challenging the NATO communityto improve awareness and exploitation of EDTs.In response,the STO developed a comprehensiveassessment of EDTs,and their accompanying S&T ecosystem 2.Since then,the STB,through th
162、eOffice of Chief Scientist,has supplemented its earlier EDT studies,responding to NATOs ImplementationStrategy for EDTs.This resulted in a series of NATO Chief Scientist reports and NATO documents(AC/323)summarising or exploring the S&T landscape.Those publicly released or unclassified reportsmay be
163、 found at https:/www.sto.nato.int/Pages/NATO-Chief-Scientist-Reports.aspx and include studieson women in the armed forces,Quantum technologies,AI,Autonomy,human factors for special forces,CBRN,third country S&T developments and technology weak signals.In addition,STO reports such asthose on biotechn
164、ologies 34 and CBRN 35 have provided unique and valuable insights into the futuredevelopment of associated S&T areas.2.3.5AnalyticsTo provide a solid analytic basis for the assessment of EDTs,the NATO Office of the Chief Scientistco-developed with the NATO Communications and Information Agency(NCIA)
165、the S&T EcosystemAssessment Model(STEAM)Figure 2.6.STEAM is hosted by the NATO software factory and is anAI-enabled analysis tool that assesses various published reports,journal articles and pre-prints to explorecurrent trends,collaboration,national focus,and research interests.The system pulls from
166、 over 7 milliondocuments and 200 million abstracts,providing a representative sampling of current research activitiesover the last five years.The underlying data is pulled from Microsoft Academic 36,arXiv 37(Physics,2.3 Information Sources16Figure 2.4:Microsoft Forms Survey of STO network on S&T tre
App Annie:2020 深度剖析新型冠状病毒对全球移动经济的影响(13页).pdf
QuestMobile:2020银发经济洞察报告(26页).pdf
PREQIN:2020大中华区创新经济迎来私募创投新机遇(39页).pdf
IBM:“十四五”开局之年再谈企业架构驱动的数字化转型(7页).pdf
经济观察:2020疫情经济生活观察—新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情下的经济生活特别调查报告(26页).pdf
国际公益学院:2019善经济观察报告(28页).pdf
2020中国经济中长期发展报告(22页).pdf
能源基金会:绿色交通与低碳城市融资研究报告(2017年)(117页).pdf
微信:2020码上经济影响力报告(11页).pdf
蜜雪冰城招股说明书-连锁茶饮第一股(724页).pdf
麦肯锡:2023中国消费者报告:韧性时代(33页).pdf
线上健身第一股-keep招股说明书(463页).pdf
罗振宇2023“时间的朋友”跨年演讲完整PDF.pdf
QuestMobile:2022新中产人群洞察报告(37页).pdf
小红书:2023年度生活趋势报告(34页).pdf
QuestMobile:2022年中国短视频直播电商发展洞察报告(30页).pdf
工业4.0俱乐部:ChatGPT认知白皮书(151页).pdf
町芒:2022现制茶饮行业研究报告(47页).pdf
吴晓波2023“发光吧勇敢者”跨年演讲完整PPT(129页).pdf