当前位置:首页 > 报告详情

1150_Garcia.pdf

上传人: 明**** 编号:1012233 2025-12-21 24页 906.65KB

1、The long SFA lesionOptions whats best?Lawrence A.Garcia,MDDirector,Vascular ServicesCatholic Health Services,Long IslandSt.Francis Hospital and Heart CenterRoslyn,NYDisclosure Statement of Financial InterestGrant/Research SupportConsulting(non-compensated)Major Stock Shareholder/EquityRoyalty Income

2、Ownership/FounderIntellectual Property RightsOther Financial BenefitAbbott,Medtronic,BSCMedtronic,Boston Scientific,Abbott,PhillipsPrimacea,TissueGen,Orchestra,R3 Vascular,Transit Medical,Syntervention,CagentNone Innovation Vascular PartnersNone None Within the past 12 months,I or my spouse/partner

3、have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s)listed below.Affiliation/Financial RelationshipCompany 104 patients Claudicants/CLI StentPTARB4 12%13%ABI StentPTA 0.570.54Schillinger NEJM 200610.19.237324315051015202530354045Lesion length(cm)Occlusion(%)Stent2(%)Sten

4、tPTA At two years Stenting 46%PTA 69%p0.04 Clinical difference 43%vs 33%P=NS Walking distance No differenceTLRTVRSchillinger Circ 2007115:2745-2749ABSOLUTE 2-yearZILVER PTX5-Year Primary Patency(PSVR 2.0)Zilver PTX vs.Standard Care5-Year Freedom from TLRZilver PTX vs.Standard Care Munster registry E

5、luvia DES LL 19 cm PP 5 years 65%CD-TLR 5 years 79%Torsello G CVIR 20SUPERB37.5%57.2%5.3%234Rutherford-Becker CategoryPatient CharacteristicsITT(N=264)Age(mean)68.7Male63.6%History of coronary disease66.9%History of MI20.3%Diabetes43.5%Current smoker31.8%Renal insufficiency9.1%Any previous periphera

6、l artery surgical revascularization38.0%Garcia LA et al Catheter Cardiolvasc Interv 2017Freedom from Loss of Primary Patency at 1 Year (PSVR 40%)VIASTAR:Lesion Characteristics Lammer,et al.JACC.2013.VIABAHNn=72BMSn=69p-value%Chronic Occlusions79%70%0.21Lesion Length(mm)1901730.13TASC Classification0

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
根据报告的内容,全文主要讨论了治疗长段股浅动脉(SFA)病变的最佳方案。以下是关键点: 1. 治疗长段SFA病变有多种设备选择,最佳方案存在争议。 2. Supera装置在长期成功方面表现最佳。 3. TOBA III试验显示,无论是长段还是短段病变,支架系统与可接受的主要通畅率相结合。 4. 球囊扩张导管(DCB)在短期和长期均证明有益。 5. 预期无论短期支架还是长段支架或DCB,耐用结果应视为等效,尽管再狭窄的失败模式通常最好是局部的而非弥漫性的。 6. Munster登记显示,Eluvia DES在19厘米的LL中,5年主要通畅率为65%,5年CD-TLR为79%。 7. VIASTAR试验显示,在≥20厘米的病变中,VIABAHN与BMS相比,再狭窄较少(p=0.007),无统计学差异的闭塞或ALI发生率。 8. Zamani等人的研究显示,在所有ITT中,12个月通畅率为57-47-44,5年CD-TLR为81-66-53。
最佳方案揭秘?" 哪种设备最胜一筹?" 选择最佳策略!"
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠