为什么中欧还没有实施大型氧化还原液流电池？公用事业公司的观点.pdf

1、Dr.Karl Anton ZachInternational Flow Battery ForumVienna,24.June 2025Why Arent Large Redox Flow Batteries Implemented in Central Europe Yet?A Utilitys Perspective1including purchase rights;excluding non-fully-consolidated installations(Ashta 1&2 and Nussdorf)2excluding leased/contracted installation

2、s of which 27,989 GWh from run-of-river and 5,459 GWh from pumping/storage power plants All figures ACTUAL production 2024VERBUND Company presentation 2025Page 3VERBUND:Sustainable energy future96%generation from renewable energy sourcesHydropower190%of electricity generation132 hydropower plants33,

3、448 GWh electricityWind power5%of electricity generation 342 wind power plants1,818 GWh electricityThermal power1%of electricity generation 47 photovoltaic farms446 GWh electricityElectricitygenerationBattery storage200 technology providers located Project pipeline with technologies with lower TRL i

4、n planning/implementation:AquaBatt:(innovative acid-base-Redox-Flow with 5-10 kW power)NESTOR&SIA:Pilot projects in MW-scale for wind-/PV-hybridisation Due to economies of scale,LIBs have achieved an 86%cost reduction since 2013,from 806/kWh to 115/kWh in 2024.*In the same period,due to technologica

5、l advancement LIBs improved service life,efficiency,and resilienceare steadily improving.In 2024 69 GW/169 GWh of battery storage systems(BESS)were installed globally-98%of which are LIBs.*In Europe,BESS also recorded strong growth from 12 GW/22 GWh to a total of 35 GW/54 GWh in 2024.*Falling capaci

6、ty costs are leading to the economic viability of projects with ever longer discharge durations.While 1-hour storage systems were still primarily implemented in 2020,the figure was already 2.4 hours in 2024.First LIB projects with a discharge duration of 8 hours have already been announced or are cu