当前位置:首页 >英文主页 >中英对照 > 报告详情

2020年确保美国保持生物制药竞争力研究报告- 信息技术与创新基金会(英文版)(93页).pdf

上传人: Me****y 编号:19516 2020-09-23 93页 1.42MB

1、 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2) spurring domestic innovation; 3) spurring increased domestic production; and 4) combatting foreign mercantilism. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY however, they dipped from a high of 5,694 in 2005 to 4,688 in 2015, the latest year for which this data is available. (See figure 19.) Fi

2、gure 19: Number of triadic biotechnology and pharmaceuticals patent applications by priority date86 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 United StatesChinaIndiaGermanyUnited Kingdom 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 United StatesEuropean Union (28 countries)JapanRest of World INFOR

3、MATION TECHNOLOGY between 1975 and 1979, Europe led the United States, with 149 drugs to 66.88 When considering new drugs as a share of GDP, the United States also leads, but not by as much, followed by Japan and Europe (See table 6.) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 United StatesEuropean Union

4、(28 countries)Japan INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY effective technology transfer and commercialization mechanisms; robust IP protections; a pricing system that allows innovators to earn sufficient revenues to reinvest in innovation; tax incentives to encourage investment; and an effective drug approval syst

5、em. A signature strength of Americas biopharmaceutical innovation system has been complementarity between public and private-sector investment in life-sciences R $23.6 billion contributed by “other” sources, including universities themselves and other nonprofit research institutions; and $4.8 billio

6、n contributed by industry.117 Bayh-Dole enables universities to retain the IP rights stemming from federally funded, university-conducted basic life-sciences research, which universities then often license to businesses (with 67 percent of these university licenses going to start-ups and small busin

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
本文主要讨论了美国生物制药行业的竞争力,并提出了保持其领导地位的政策建议。主要观点包括: 1. 美国生物制药行业对美国经济和健康有重要贡献,包括雇佣超过50万工人,平均工资是普通工人的2.39倍。 2. 从2004年到2018年,美国公司生产的新药数量是欧洲公司的近两倍,是日本公司的3到4倍。 3. 尽管美国在生物制药研发和创新方面具有优势,但制造业已经下降。从2009年到2018年,药品和药物制造业的实际增加值下降了近三分之一。 4. 部分由于此,美国在药品贸易中的逆差从2010年的160亿美元增加到2019年的770亿美元。 5. 为了支持该行业,政策制定者应关注:维持优势,包括定价、技术转让和知识产权;刺激国内创新;刺激国内生产;以及反对外国的贸易保护主义。 6. 文章提出了多项政策建议,包括维持美国在定价、技术转让和知识产权方面的优势,刺激国内创新,增加国内生产,以及更积极地反对外国的贸易保护主义。
美国生物制药行业如何为经济做出贡献? 美国在生物制药创新方面有哪些优势? 如何确保美国在生物制药领域的竞争力?
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠