当前位置:首页 >英文主页 >中英对照 > 报告详情

兰德公司:2024高级研究项目机构在项目选择过程中如何平衡研究的难度和可行性:“金发姑娘”问题的益处与局限(英文版)(20页).pdf

上传人: Y**** 编号:185644 2024-12-18 20页 199.90KB

下载:

1、AARON B.FRANK,RYAN ANDREW BROWNHow Advanced Research Project Agencies Pick Their ProgramsThe Benefits and Limits of Goldilocks ProblemsThe U.S.government has increasingly looked to employ Advanced Research Project Agen-cies(ARPAs)to advance scientific knowledge and develop novel technological capabi

2、lities in a variety of departmental missions.1 These ARPAs differ from traditional research and development(R&D)organizations in that,by design,their mandate is to fund high-risk,high-reward programs that,if successful,would provide the United States with transformative capa-bilities.2 These organiz

3、ationsthe Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency(DARPA),the Intel-ligence Advanced Research Projects Activity(IARPA),the Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency(HSARPA),the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy(ARPA-E),the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Health(ARPA-H),and Advanc

4、ed Research Projects Agency-Infrastructure(ARPA-I)take on scientific and technical challenges within an organizational framework that empowers a small number of program managers(PMs)to make substantial invest-ments in research areas to test whether paradigm-changing approaches to meeting their depar

5、t-ments mission needs are viable and to identify gaps in scientific and technical knowledge that limit what is possible.To better understand what types of risks ARPA programs should take,we held discussions in March through June 2023 with 18 experts from within and outside of RAND,using the concept

6、of“Goldilocks problems”as an initial framing for our discussions.3 Within this pool of experts,six were current or former ARPA PMs or senior managers,and an additional four worked closely with the ARPAs through their professional roles in other government research organizations or feder-ally funded

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
本文主要探讨了高级研究计划局(ARPA)如何选择其项目,以及它们在科学、技术、操作范式变革研究中的风险偏好。文章首先介绍了ARPA的组织结构和主要管理工具——海尔梅尔问题。然后,文章通过与专家的讨论,总结了ARPA在问题选择和风险管理方面的见解,包括: 1. ARPA倾向于选择“ARPA难”的问题,即那些明显具有挑战性且超出现有能力的问题。 2. ARPA强调高风险、高回报的研究,这可能导致在机构层面上面临采用新技术和接受其更大影响和挑战的挑战。 3. ARPA在项目评估中使用指标和度量,但专家对此存在分歧,一些人认为这有助于确保资源不被浪费,而另一些人则认为这可能阻碍高风险研究。 4. ARPA在研究项目中采用竞争和合作,但专家对竞争在实现项目目标方面的有效性存在分歧。 5. ARPA的研究成果在转化为政府或商业用途方面面临挑战,因为它们可能挑战现有的组织和工作方式。 6. ARPA的投资应产生其他人不会资助的技术、能力和知识,即应具有高边际回报。 7. ARPA的组织模型具有生物学的类比,即个体大小与其抗风险能力之间的关系。 总的来说,文章强调了ARPA在选择高风险、高回报项目时面临的挑战,以及它们在科学和技术生态系统中的独特地位。
高级研究计划局如何选择项目? 高级研究计划局如何管理研究风险? 高级研究计划局如何确保研究成果的转化?
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠