1、 Author:Daniel Milano,Jason Buchan,Sonny Cain,Victoria Sykes,Vivien Maertens Date:01/09/2025 Reference:PN000667-RPT-007 Status:Public FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE Technology Review of Tension-Leg Platform Floating Wind Turbines Public Summary Report Technology Review of Tension-Leg Pl
2、atform Floating Wind Turbines 1-Sep-2025 i DISCLAIMER Whilst the information contained in this report has been prepared and collated in good faith,ORE Catapult makes no representation or warranty(express or implied)as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein nor shall we b
3、e liable for any loss or damage resultant from reliance on same.DOCUMENT HISTORY Revision Date Prepared by Checked by Approved by Revision History Rev 0 15/07/2025 Daniel Milano,Jason Buchan,Sonny Cain,Victoria Sykes,Vivien Maertens Jack Paterson Fraser MacDonald For partners review Rev 1 01/09/2025
4、 Daniel Milano,Jason Buchan,Sonny Cain,Victoria Sykes,Vivien Maertens Jack Paterson Fraser MacDonald Minor comments addressed Technology Review of Tension-Leg Platform Floating Wind Turbines 1-Sep-2025 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Tension-leg platform(TLP)designs have a number of advantages with respect to
5、semi-submersible platforms,barges and spar buoys.They have the smallest mooring footprint of all substructure typologies and reduced motion responses in all degrees of freedom,with potential benefits in terms of lower cumulative fatigue damage and improved energy yield.However,in comparison to other
6、 substructure typologies,TLP solutions are rarely adopted in ongoing projects and their technology readiness level(TRL)remains lower to date.The reasons for this reluctance can be attributed to a limited understanding of the technology and to a number of challenges further discussed hereinafter.Some
0731-84720580
商务合作：really158d
研搜
微信扫码登录
手机快捷登录
账号登录
