当前位置:首页 >英文主页 >中英对照 > 中译版报告详情

世界银行:2025基于内容分析法的教学观察工具效度研究报告:PLAY与Teach Primary比较(中译版)(64页).pdf

上传人: 白**** 编号:620357 2025-03-27 64页 2.40MB

下载:

1、Validating Teaching Observation Tools:A Content-Based Approach for PLAY and Teach PrimaryEDUCATIONWORKING PAPERDiego Luna Bazaldua and Emma CarterNo.10|February 2024Public Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure Authorized 2025 International Ban

2、k for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank1818 H Street NWWashington DC 20433Telephone:202-473-1000Email:AskEdworldbank.orgInternet:www.worldbank.org/en/topic/educationThis work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions.The findings,interpretations,and conclusi

3、ons expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank,its Board ofExecutive Directors,or the governments they represent.The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy,completeness,or currency of the data included in this work anddoes not assume responsibility for any erro

4、rs,omissions,or discrepancies in the information,or liability withrespect to the use of or failure to use the information,methods,processes,or conclusions set forth.Theboundaries,colors,denominations,links/footnotes and other information shown in this work do not imply anyjudgment on the part of The

5、 World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement oracceptance of such boundaries.The citation of works authored by others does not mean the World Bankendorses the views expressed by those authors or the content of their works.Nothing herein shall constitute or be construed

6、 or considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privilegesand immunities of The World Bank,all of which are specifically reserved.Rights and PermissionsThe material in this work is subject to copyright.Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of itsknowledge,this work may be reproduce

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
本文主要比较了LEGO基金会开发的PLAY工具和世界银行的Teach Primary工具,旨在评估这两个工具在测量教学实践方面的相似性和重叠程度。研究方法包括定性分析(Delphi方法)和定量分析。定性分析通过专家评审,将PLAY工具的条目与Teach Primary工具的行为进行匹配,结果显示约三分之一条目匹配良好,三分之一条目没有明确匹配,其余三分之一条目需要进一步审查。定量分析使用埃塞俄比亚、秘鲁和塞拉利昂的课堂数据,评估两个工具得分的相关性,结果显示两者存在微弱的正相关关系,表明它们测量的是相关但不同的教学实践方面。此外,研究还发现PLAY工具的结构可能需要调整,以更好地反映其旨在测量的技能。总体而言,研究结果表明这两个工具都很有价值,但各有侧重,使用多个方法评估教学质量非常重要。
教学观察工具如何评估教学实践? 教学观察工具如何测量教学质量和学生学习成果? 教学观察工具如何支持全球教学和学习的改进?
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠