当前位置:首页 >英文主页 >中英对照 > 报告详情

Taxand:2024年全球税务经济雇主调研报告(英文版)(50页).pdf

上传人: Y**** 编号:180596 2024-11-11 50页 15.66MB

下载:

1、LAST UPDATED ON 12th APRIL 2024SURVEY ON ECONOMIC EMPLOYER 2024Your global tax partnerECONOMIC EMPLOYER SURVEY 2024TAXAND SURVEY ON ECONOMIC EMPLOYER 2024LAST UPDATED:APRIL 20242 Taxands latest Economic Employer survey 2024 explores the approach of tax administrations across the globe in terms of th

2、eir application of the concept and examines our experience as advisors of the nuances that apply for corporates engaging with local tax authorities.These findings stand to play a valuable role in contributing insight to corporate entities and individuals,as they seek to manage the tax affairs of int

3、ernationally mobile employees.Development of Economic Employer concept The economic employer concept derives from Art.15(2)b of the OECD Model Tax Convention.According to said article,a contracting member state is entitled to tax an employees remuneration if the remuneration is borne from an economi

4、c perspective by,or there is a clear integration of the said employee with an employer with residency in the contracting member state.This allocation of the right to tax the employees remuneration in general becomes effective from the first day of the employees activities.As of today,many countries

5、have still not implemented the concept into their national law to justify wage tax withholding obligations.This implementation is however led by the desire of many tax authorities to establish withholding obligations at source.The Economic Employer concept uses criteria to define the workers true em

6、ployer and consequently establishes who is liable for the fulfilment of withholding tax obligations.Europe versus the WorldOne of the key observations from this survey is the overwhelming dominance of European nations who have implemented the Economic Employer model recently,despite being given no f

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
根据报告的内容,本文主要探讨了全球范围内税务机关在应用经济雇主概念方面的做法,并分析了企业在与当地税务机关打交道时所面临的微妙问题。文章指出,经济雇主概念源自OECD模型税收公约第15条(2)b款,允许签约成员国对员工的薪酬征税,如果该薪酬在经济上由该签约成员国的雇主承担,或者该员工与该签约成员国的雇主有明确的整合。目前,许多国家尚未将该概念纳入国内法以证明工资税扣缴义务。 文章还指出,欧洲国家在实施经济雇主模型方面占据主导地位,尽管OECD或欧盟并未正式要求他们这样做。例如,德国、爱尔兰、瑞典、波兰等国家都使用经济雇主概念来证明工资税扣缴义务。然而,对于那些尚未采用该概念的国家,如匈牙利、芬兰、希腊和西班牙,他们可能在中期内也会采用,或者在应用相关税收条约时会考虑采用经济雇主概念。 此外,文章还讨论了经济雇主概念对企业的影响,指出尽管欧盟有人员自由流动,但经济雇主概念在当前形式下,可能会使跨国工人之间的临时流动比实际需要更具挑战性。这是因为没有来自欧盟或OECD等管理机构的规定或规则,所以每个国家都可以设定自己的税收法规。 最后,文章建议公司层面上,合规过程的关键在于提前规划,这需要专业的税务建议,并且雇主需要了解哪些情况需要更详细的税务分析。
欧洲国家如何实施经济雇主概念? 经济雇主概念对跨国公司有何影响? 各国如何处理经济雇主概念下的税务问题?
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠