当前位置:首页 >英文主页 >中英对照 > 报告详情

FICO:2024年荷兰授权推送支付(APP)欺诈与诈骗的影响调查报告(英文版)(17页).pdf

上传人: Kell****reet 编号:180437 2024-11-08 17页 1.24MB

下载:

1、2024 Scams Impact Survey:NetherlandsInvestigating the impact of authorized push payment (APP)fraud/scamsFICO Proprietary ResearchConducted July 2024,published October 2024Survey2As real-time payments(RTP)grow in the Netherlands,can you effectively balance protection and customer experience?In the Ne

2、therlands,real-time payments(RTP)services continue to impact the payments landscape.Most Dutch consumers have used RTP,and many have formed opinions about its utility and security.Additionally,more are experiencing scams and reporting losses than a year ago.A vast majority of Dutch consumers have se

3、nt and received RTP,and they are experiencing scams and losses as their usage increases.Perceptions about RTP security are changing,with more consumers feeling they are comparably safe to credit cards,yet an increasing number of individuals are reporting scam losses to their banks.A majority of Dutc

4、h consumers say the top two ways their banks can protect them better from scams is through improved fraud detection and notifications.Read this report for a deeper look at how consumers in the Netherlands are using RTP,experiencing scams and losses,and changing their opinions about RTP and scam defe

5、nse.An important note about the comparative data in this e-book.The data referenced throughout this e-book derives from two surveys FICO conducted in 2023 and 2024.Each survey asked more than 12,000 consumers across 14 countries their opinions and experiences regarding RTP usage,scams,and their bank

6、s scam management capabilities.When year-over-year comparisons are made,they are referring to a comparison of these two surveys that asked the same question in each year the survey was conducted.3RTP:Changing the payments landscape The majority of consumers in the Netherlands say they have sent RTP(

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
根据报告的内容,本文主要讨论了荷兰实时支付(RTP)诈骗的影响。主要观点如下: 1. 荷兰的RTP服务正在不断增长,大多数消费者已经使用过RTP,并且对RTP的安全性和实用性形成了自己的看法。 2. 越来越多的消费者在使用RTP时遭遇诈骗,并报告了损失。大多数消费者认为RTP的安全性相当于信用卡,但越来越多的消费者报告了银行诈骗损失。 3. 大多数消费者认为银行可以通过改进欺诈检测和通知来更好地保护他们免受诈骗的侵害。 4. 消费者对银行处理诈骗事件的方式不满意时,大多数会向银行投诉,有些甚至可能会更换银行。 5. 消费者希望银行部署更好的欺诈检测系统,并提供更多关于已知或新兴RTP诈骗的警告。 6. 银行需要采取措施来平衡保护消费者和提供良好的客户体验,以防止诈骗的发生。
荷兰实时支付诈骗现状如何? 消费者如何看待银行在诈骗中的责任? 银行应如何提高实时支付诈骗防范能力?
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠