当前位置:首页 >英文主页 >中英对照 > 中译版报告详情

ACT:2026美国高中生对人工智能在大学申请中的应用认知调研报告(中译版)(15页).pdf

上传人: 小*** 编号:1263357 2026-06-03 15页 2.51MB

下载:

1、ACT Research|Issue Brief|January 2026 1 High School Students Views of AI in the College Application Process Jeff Schiel Introduction Examples of college readiness indictors include applicants high school grades,essays,and college admissions test scores.Of these,high school grades are most prominent

2、in the college admissions process.Recently,the National Association for College Admission Counseling(NACAC)reported that high school grades were the most important factor in admissions decisions,with 74%of its member colleges viewing grades as considerably important.Over time,the significance placed

3、 on high school grades appears to be increasing:Ten years prior,only about half(52%)of NACACs member colleges held this same perspective of grades importance(National Association for College Admission Counseling,2023).However,grades,despite their prominence,have imperfections.Evidence of a phenomeno

4、n known as grade inflation,which occurs when there is an increase in grades over time but no concomitant increase in ability(Bejar&Blew,1981),has been around for many years.For example,ACT presented evidence of this phenomenon thirty years ago(Ziomek&Svec,1995)and on several subsequent occasions(Woo

5、druff&Ziomek,2004;Sanchez&Moore,2022;Sanchez,2023,2025).Concerns over grade inflation continue,and recently the accuracy of high school grades as a measure of student achievement has been questioned.For example,a study of grade inflation that used longitudinal data from students in Washington state

6、found significant changes over time in grades and a noticeably weak relationship between grades in math and achievement,which was measured by scores on state-administered assessments(Goldhaber&Young,2024).In addition,the study found a significant increase in the proportion of students receiving grad

word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改,预览文件经过压缩,下载原文更清晰!
三个皮匠报告文库所有资源均是客户上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作商用。
1. **高中成绩重要性**:69%学生认为高中成绩在大学申请中“非常重要”,是所有指标中最重要的(高于论文53%、考试51%等)。 2. **AI对成绩的影响**:71%学生认为AI作弊导致成绩无法准确反映能力;81%认为AI易用于作弊;59%认为使用AI的学生成绩更好。 3. **AI对申请公平性的影响**:70%学生认为AI在申请中提供不公平优势,69%认为使用AI的学生显著占优。 4. **成绩膨胀问题**:研究指出成绩长期膨胀(如华盛顿州A/B比例增加但未达标),且成绩预测大学成绩的能力下降。 5. **考试分数优势**:标准化考试(如ACT)受AI影响小,因考试环境严格,成为更可靠的指标。
**AI如何影响成绩?** **成绩还可靠吗?** **AI能帮升学吗?**
客服
商务合作
小程序
服务号
折叠